Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004 Jan;19(1):64-70.

Orthotic intervention in forefoot and rearfoot strike running patterns.

Author information

1
Motion Analysis Laboratory, Shriners Hospitals for Children, 3551 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA. claughton@shrinenet.org

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the differential effect of custom orthoses on the lower extremity mechanics of a forefoot and rearfoot strike pattern.

DESIGN:

Fifteen subjects ran with both a forefoot and a rearfoot strike pattern with and without orthoses. Lower extremity kinematic and kinetic variables were compared between strike pattern and orthotic conditions.

BACKGROUND:

Foot orthoses have been shown to be effective in controlling excessive rearfoot motion in rearfoot strikers. The effect of orthotic intervention on rearfoot motion in forefoot strikers has not been previously reported.

METHODS:

Five trials were collected for each condition. Peak rearfoot eversion, eversion excursion, eversion velocity, peak inversion moment, and inversion work were compared between conditions. Kinematic variables in the sagittal plane of the rearfoot and in the frontal and sagittal plane of the knee were also determined.

RESULTS:

Increased rearfoot excursions and velocities and decreased peak eversion were noted in the forefoot strike pattern compared to the rearfoot strike pattern. Orthotic intervention, however,did not significantly change rearfoot motion in either strike pattern. Reductions in internal rotation and abduction of the knee were noted with orthotic intervention.

CONCLUSIONS:

Foot orthoses do not differentially effect rearfoot motion of a rearfoot strike and a forefoot strike running pattern. Orthotic intervention has a larger and more systematic effect on rearfoot kinetics compared to rearfoot kinematics.

PMID:
14659932
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center