Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Account Res. 2003 Apr-Jun;10(2):123-35.

From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.

Author information

1
2S-17 Brody Building, The Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA. resnikd@mail.ecu.edu

Abstract

This essay proposes a new definition of scientific "misconduct," which is broader than the definition recently adopted by the U.S. government. According to the proposed definition, misconduct is a serious and intentional violation of accepted scientific practices, commonsense ethical norms, or research regulations in proposing, designing, conducting, reviewing, or reporting research. Punishable misconduct includes fabrication of data or experiments, falsification of data, plagiarism, or interference with a misconduct investigation. Misconduct does not include honest errors, differences of opinion, or ethically questionable research practices.

PMID:
14577424
DOI:
10.1080/08989620300508
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Taylor & Francis
Loading ...
Support Center