Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;189(2):438-43.

Double incontinence in urogynecologic practice: a new insight.

Author information

1
Department of Gynecological Surgery, University of Milan, Bicocca-Bassini Hospital, Italy. marcosoligo@libero.it

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

This study was undertaken to evaluate the prevalence of anal incontinence in an urogynecologic setting and to investigate the relationship between lower urinary tract dysfunction and anal incontinence.

STUDY DESIGN:

The study included 504 women referred to our urogynecologic outpatient clinic who were prospectively investigated and asked specific questions on anal incontinence. Clinical and instrumental data were compared between women with urinary incontinence and with double incontinence, with further analysis for subgroups in the anal incontinent group of women (passive/urge). For continuous variables, the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used, and the Fisher exact test was applied to dicotomic variables. Logistic regression was used for categorical data. A level of P<.005 was considered significant.

RESULTS:

Of the investigated women, 20.2% were also anally incontinent. Women with double incontinence showed higher scores for urinary urgency (P=.010), which reached the established level of significance only in the subgroup with urge anal incontinence (P=.003). In this group, a higher prevalence of detrusor overactivity was observed.

CONCLUSION:

Anal incontinence is highly prevalent among women with lower urinary tract disorders. The existence of subgroups of patients having different kinds of anal and urinary disorders should be taken into consideration both for research purposes and for new treatment perspectives.

PMID:
14520214
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center