Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003 Sep;47(1):303-11.

Detection of antimicrobial resistance by small rural hospital microbiology laboratories: comparison of survey responses with current NCCLS laboratory standards.

Author information

1
Qualis Health, Boise, ID, USA. kurts@qualishealth.org

Abstract

Microbiology laboratory personnel from 77 rural hospitals in Idaho, Nevada, Utah, and eastern Washington were surveyed in July 2000 regarding their routine practices for detecting antimicrobial resistance. Their self-reported responses were compared to recommended laboratory practices. Most hospitals reported performing onsite bacterial identification and susceptibility testing. Many reported detecting targeted antimicrobial resistant organisms. While only 5/61 hospitals (8%) described using screening tests capable of detecting all 8 targeted types of resistance, most (57/61, 93%) were capable of accurately screening for at least 6 types. Conversely, most hospitals (58/61, 95%) reported confirmatory testing capable of identifying only 3 or fewer resistance types with high-level penicillin resistance among pneumococci, methicillin and vancomycin resistance among staphylococci and enterococci, and extended spectrum beta-lactamase production by Gram-negative bacilli presenting the greatest difficulties. Furthermore, only 50% of hospitals compiled annual antibiogram reports to help physicians choose initial therapy for suspected infectious illnesses. This survey suggests that the antimicrobial susceptibility testing in many rural hospitals may be unreliable.

PMID:
12967743
DOI:
10.1016/s0732-8893(03)00092-0
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center