Send to

Choose Destination
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Nov;11(11):979-84.

Comparison of the autoSCAN-W/A and Vitek Automicrobic systems for identification and susceptibility testing of bacteria.

Author information

Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands.


The identification and susceptibility testing of bacteria by the autoSCAN-W/A rapid panels and Vitek Automicrobic systems were compared. A total of 291 clinical isolates, including 207 members of the Enterobacteriaceae, 41 nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli, 31 Staphylococcus aureus strains and 12 Enterococcus faecalis strains, were tested. autoSCAN-W/A and Vitek correctly identified 93% and 94% respectively of the Enterobacteriaceae, the identification in an additional 2% and 5% of strains respectively being reported as correct with a low probability. autoSCAN-W/A reported all identification results within 2 h after inoculation, whereas Vitek reported the identification results for the majority of gram-negative bacilli between 4 h and 6 h after inoculation. autoSCAN-W/A and Vitek reported 81% and 74% of MIC results respectively after 3-6 h incubation. The rates of very major susceptibility errors were 0.4% and 0.4% for autoSCAN-W/A and Vitek respectively, the rates of major errors 0.4% and 1% respectively, and the rates of minor errors 4% and 3% respectively. Six of 30 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains failed to grow sufficiently for susceptibility testing in the autoSCAN-W/A system, and four Xanthomonas maltophilia strains had insufficient growth for susceptibility testing in both systems. The majority of results of susceptibility testing of nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli were reported more than 6 h after inoculation. Both systems were reliable and easy to operate, and gave accurate results for common clinical isolates.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center