Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Gynecol Oncol. 2003 Jun;89(3):424-8.

Strength of correlations between colposcopic impression and biopsy histology.

Author information

  • 1Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southern Illinois University, Springfield, IL 62794, USA.



The aim of this study was to determine the strength of the correlation between colposcopic impression and biopsy histology.


In an urban referral clinic, colposcopy and directed biopsy were performed between July 1, 1996, and December 31, 1999, by residents supervised by board-certified attending obstetrician-gynecologists. Impression and biopsy were graded as benign, suggesting condyloma or koilocytosis, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 1-3, or cancer. The significance of association was assessed by chi(2) testing and the strength by kappa statistics.


Colposcopies were performed on 2825 women, with colposcopic impression and biopsy grade known for 2112. Exact agreement was found in only 893 (37%) women, but results agreed within one grade in 1203 (75%). The association between impression and histology was significant (P < 0.001), but the strength of the correlation was poor (0.20). The positive predictive value of any colposcopic abnormality for any histologic abnormality was 80%. The negative predictive value of a benign colposcopic impression was 68%. The sensitivity of colposcopy with a threshold of any lesion detected was 89%, and the specificity was 52%. The sensitivity for CIN 2/3 was 56%.


Colposcopy is imprecise, although useful in estimating lesion grade. Management decisions require biopsy.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center