Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Health Econ. 2003 May;12(5):377-92.

Missing... presumed at random: cost-analysis of incomplete data.

Author information

1
Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Institute of Health Sciences, Headington, UK. andrew.biggs@ihs.oc.ac.uk

Abstract

When collecting patient-level resource use data for statistical analysis, for some patients and in some categories of resource use, the required count will not be observed. Although this problem must arise in most reported economic evaluations containing patient-level data, it is rare for authors to detail how the problem was overcome. Statistical packages may default to handling missing data through a so-called 'complete case analysis', while some recent cost-analyses have appeared to favour an 'available case' approach. Both of these methods are problematic: complete case analysis is inefficient and is likely to be biased; available case analysis, by employing different numbers of observations for each resource use item, generates severe problems for standard statistical inference. Instead we explore imputation methods for generating 'replacement' values for missing data that will permit complete case analysis using the whole data set and we illustrate these methods using two data sets that had incomplete resource use information.

PMID:
12720255
DOI:
10.1002/hec.766
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Support Center