Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Appl Nurs Res. 2003 Feb;16(1):2-8.

Differentiating quality improvement from research.

Author information

1
School of Nursing at Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Abstract

Monitoring of quality of care has always been an important part of health care. Self-regulation and external standards require care providers to furnish safe environments for the patient. Similarities in methods used by quality improvement (QI) projects and clinical research have created some confusion in differentiating the two practices. This article reviews the current literature and differences between QI and research. In addition, the article identifies and discusses four criteria: intervention, risk, audience, and data source, which allow investigators to differentiate between the two practices and follow the appropriate procedures for project review.

PMID:
12624857
DOI:
10.1053/apnr.2003.50000
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center