Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Feb;188(2):566-74.

Ultrasonographic prediction of term birth weight: how accurate is it?

Author information

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Nahum001@mc.Duke.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of 25 ultrasonic algorithms for the estimation of term fetal weight and to compare these results to an equation that is based on maternal and pregnancy-specific characteristics alone.

STUDY DESIGN:

Ultrasonography was performed in 82 nondiabetic gravid women at 35 to 41 weeks of gestation. Fetal biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, head circumference, and femur length were measured. Twenty-five ultrasonic fetal biometric algorithms and an equation that is based only on maternal characteristics were used to predict birth weight.

RESULTS:

The correlation between predicted and actual birth weight ranged from 0.44 to 0.79 for the ultrasonic algorithms and was 0.60 for the maternal characteristics equation. Ultrasonic algorithms had mean absolute prediction errors that ranged from +/-263 to 646 g (+/-7.5%-18.8%). Accuracy for the maternal characteristics equation was not statistically different from the best performing ultrasonic algorithms (+/-353 g, +/-10.4%).

CONCLUSION:

Term birth weight estimates that use ultrasonography are generally no more accurate than predictions that are based solely on quantitative assessment of maternal and pregnancy-specific characteristics.

PMID:
12592273
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center