Comparison of the adsorption equilibrium of a few low-molecular mass compounds on a monolithic and a packed column in reversed-phase liquid chromatography

J Chromatogr A. 2002 Nov 29;978(1-2):81-107. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(02)01279-7.

Abstract

Adsorption isotherm data were acquired by frontal analysis for several low-molecular mass compounds (3-phenyl 1-propanol, 4-tert.-butylphenol, butylbenzene, and butyl benzoate) on a classical packed column and a monolithic column using methanol-water RP-HPLC conditions. These columns have similar characteristics (C18-bonded silica, close specific surface areas and bonding densities). In each case, the isotherm model best accounting for the data was the same on both columns. The solute polarity determines the class of this model. For the two -OH compounds it was a Langmuirian adsorption isotherm. The hydrocarbon data were best modeled by an anti-Langmuir convex-downward isotherm model. The adsorption data for the aromatic ester exhibited a nearly linear behavior, depending on the methanol concentration of the mobile phase. A slightly convex downward isotherm was obtained at high methanol concentrations while the best fitting was obtained with a liquid-solid extended multilayer B.E.T. isotherm model at low concentrations. The validation of these models is discussed in detail. In all cases, similar values of the adsorption-desorption constants were found, underlining the closeness of the adsorption energies on both columns. By contrast, the adsorption capacity of the monolithic column was found to be approximately 1.4 greater than that of the packed column in spite of the close values of the surface areas of the silica in both columns.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adsorption
  • Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid / instrumentation*
  • Models, Chemical
  • Molecular Weight
  • Thermodynamics