Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Health Commun. 2002 Oct-Dec;7(5):445-53.

Can we measure encoded exposure? Validation evidence from a national campaign.

Author information

1
School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. south026@umn.edu

Abstract

Exposure is often cited as an explanation for campaign success or failure. A lack of validation evidence for typical exposure measures, however, suggests the possibility of either misdirected measurement or incomplete conceptualization of the idea. If whether people engage campaign content in a basic, rudimentary manner is what matters when we talk about exposure, a recognition-based task should provide a useful measure of exposure, or what we might call encoded exposure, that we can validate. Data from two independent sources, the National Survey of Parents and Youth (NSPY) and purchase data from a national antidrug campaign, offer such validation. Both youth and their parents were much more likely to recognize actual campaign advertisements than to claim recognition of bogus advertisements. Also, gross rating points (GRPs) for a campaign advertisement correlated strikingly with average encoded exposure for an advertisement among both youth (r = 0.82) and their parents (r = 0.53).

PMID:
12455763
PMCID:
PMC4133105
DOI:
10.1080/10810730290001800
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center