Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Bioinformatics. 2002 Nov;18(11):1500-7.

Empirical determination of effective gap penalties for sequence comparison.

Author information

1
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.

Abstract

MOTIVATION:

No general theory guides the selection of gap penalties for local sequence alignment. We empirically determined the most effective gap penalties for protein sequence similarity searches with substitution matrices over a range of target evolutionary distances from 20 to 200 Point Accepted Mutations (PAMs).

RESULTS:

We embedded real and simulated homologs of protein sequences into a database and searched the database to determine the gap penalties that produced the best statistical significance for the distant homologs. The most effective penalty for the first residue in a gap (q+r) changes as a function of evolutionary distance, while the gap extension penalty for additional residues (r) does not. For these data, the optimal gap penalties for a given matrix scaled in 1/3 bit units (e.g. BLOSUM50, PAM200) are q=25-0.1 * (target PAM distance), r=5. Our results provide an empirical basis for selection of gap penalties and demonstrate how optimal gap penalties behave as a function of the target evolutionary distance of the substitution matrix. These gap penalties can improve expectation values by at least one order of magnitude when searching with short sequences, and improve the alignment of proteins containing short sequences repeated in tandem.

PMID:
12424122
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Support Center