Judgment (Appeal 49/85), 1985

Annu Rev Popul Law. 1988:15:56.

Abstract

The Supreme Rabbinical Appeal Court of Israel held that even though a husband had consented to his wife's artificial insemination with the sperm of a donor, he was exempt from paying maintenance for a child born as result of the procedure. A religious court in Haifa has ruled that a Jewish child born as the result of artificial insemination could only marry a proselyte for fear of marrying someone closely related. See Annual Survey of Family Law, Vol. 11, 1987, p. 182.

Publication types

  • Legal Case

MeSH terms

  • Asia
  • Asia, Western
  • Behavior
  • Biology
  • Child Care*
  • Child Rearing
  • Consanguinity*
  • Developed Countries
  • Genetics
  • Insemination, Artificial*
  • Israel
  • Judaism*
  • Jurisprudence*
  • Marriage*
  • Religion
  • Reproduction
  • Reproductive Techniques