Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Transfus Med. 2002 Aug;12(4):243-53.

US NAT yield: where are we after 2 years?

Author information

1
National Testing and Reference Laboratories and Blood Services, American Red Cross, 9315 Gaither Road, Gaithersburg, MD 20877, USA. stramers@usa.redcross.org

Abstract

The US blood supply has been tested for human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) using nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) of pools of small number of samples since early 1999. Since the implementation of NAT under an investigational new drug (IND) application, the results for the yield and false positivity have been remarkably consistent for greater than 2 years of testing even among multiple programmes using two different test methodologies and manufacturers: Gen-Probe/Chiron transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) and Roche polymerase chain reaction. All programmes in the US and Canada use NAT as a criterion for cellular as well as frozen product release. The focus of this paper is to provide an update of the programmes in the US and Canada, provide data in support of p24 antigen replacement by HIV-1 NAT and discuss the projections of residual risk of HIV, HCV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) following NAT and the associated cost/benefit.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center