Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Gerontologist. 2002 Aug;42(4):534-42.

Development, reliability, and validity of the expectations regarding aging (ERA-38) survey.

Author information

1
Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, USA. csarkisian@mednet.ucla.edu

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To develop a reliable and valid instrument to measure older adults' expectations regarding aging.

DESIGN AND METHODS:

Using focus groups, cognitive interviews, and multitrait scaling analysis, we developed a 38-item survey to measure expectations regarding aging (ERA-38). The survey consisted of 10 scales, each representing a domain of expectations. We mailed the survey to 588 English-speaking patients aged 65 years and older cared for by University of California, Los Angeles-affiliated physicians.

RESULTS:

Four hundred twenty-nine participants (73%) completed the survey. The mean age was 76 years; 54% were women. Most were White (76%). All scales other than Pain demonstrated good internal consistency reliability (alpha > or =.73) and item discrimination (> or =.80). Sixty-eight percent of respondents stated that all or most of the ERA-38 addressed things that were important. Construct validity was supported by correlations with age, activities of daily living, the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12 physical and mental component scores, and the Geriatric Depression Scale.

IMPLICATIONS:

Considerable support for the reliability and construct validity of the ERA-38 was obtained in this field study of 429 older adults. This instrument should be useful to investigators interested in measuring expectations regarding aging among older adults.

PMID:
12145381
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for eScholarship, California Digital Library, University of California
    Loading ...
    Support Center