Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Epidemiol Rev. 2002;24(1):26-38.

Analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Author information

1
Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, 950 Campbell Avenue, West Haven, CT 06516, USA. peterp5@mindspring.com

Abstract

Although the sophistication and flexibility of the statistical technology available to the data analyst have increased, some durable, simple principles remain valid. Hypothesis-driven analyses, which were anticipated and specified in the protocol, must still be kept separate and privileged relative to the important, but risky data mining made possible by modern computers. Analyses that have a firm basis in the randomization are interpreted more easily than those that rely heavily on statistical models. Outcomes--such as quality of life, symptoms, and behaviors--that require the cooperation of subjects to be measured will come to be more and more important as trials move away from mortality as the main outcome. Inevitably, such trials will have to deal with more missing data, especially because of dropout and noncompliance. There are fundamental limits on the ability of statistical methods to compensate for such problems, so they must be considered when studies are designed. Finally, it must be emphasized that the availability of software is not a substitute for experience and statistical expertise.

PMID:
12119853
DOI:
10.1093/epirev/24.1.26
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center