Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Clin Med (Lond). 2002 May-Jun;2(3):250-5.

To PEG or not to PEG.

Author information

1
Tayside University Hospital Trust, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee. chrisp@tuht.scot.nhs.uk

Abstract

Patients with adequate intestinal function who are unable to eat may benefit from enteral tube feeding. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is preferred when prolonged treatment is envisaged. PEG feeding will reduce morbidity and mortality in many such patients by reversing malnutrition. The increasing numbers of elderly patients with chronic diseases have resulted in an increased demand for PEG placement that has stretched resources. Many patients who are referred for PEGs are frail and the procedure is associated with complications. Careful management and support for the carers in the community are essential. Not all patients benefit from PEG feeding. The aim must be an improvement in the quality of life, not a prolongation of terminal disease.

PMID:
12108477
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Support Center