Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Apr;87(2):230-42.

The (un)reasonableness of reporting: antecedents and consequences of reporting sexual harassment.

Author information

1
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA. mindybergman@tamu.edu

Abstract

This study places the reporting of sexual harassment within an integrated model of the sexual harassment process. Two structural models were developed and tested in a sample (N = 6,417) of male and female military personnel. The 1st model identifies determinants and effects of reporting; reporting did not improve--and at times worsened--job, psychological, and health outcomes. The authors argue that organizational responses to reports (i.e., organizational remedies, organizational minimization, and retaliation) as well as procedural satisfaction can account for these negative effects. The 2nd model examines these mediating mechanisms; results suggest that these mediators, and not reporting itself, are the source of the negative effects of reporting. Organizational and legal implications of these findings are discussed.

PMID:
12002952
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for American Psychological Association
    Loading ...
    Support Center