Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Cell Signal. 2002 Jul;14(7):573-83.

Natural ligands of PPARgamma: are prostaglandin J(2) derivatives really playing the part?

Author information

1
Pharmacologie Mol├ęculaire et Cellulaire, Institut de Recherches Servier, 125 Chemin de Ronde, 78 290 Croissy-sur-Seine, France.

Abstract

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) family was discovered from an orphan nuclear receptor approach, and thereafter, three subtypes were identified, namely PPARalpha, PPARbeta or PPARgamma and PPARgamma. The two former seem to regulate lipid homeostasis, whereas the latter is involved, among others, in glucose homeostasis and adipocyte differentiation. PPARs were pharmacologically characterised first using peroxisome proliferators such as clofibrates, which demonstrate moderate affinity (efficiency at micromolar concentrations) and low PPARalpha/delta versus PPARgamma specificity. Hence, several laboratories have started the search for potent and subtype-specific natural PPAR activators. In this respect, prostaglandin (PG)-related compounds were identified as good PPARgamma agonists with varying specificity, the most notable PPAR ligand being 15-deoxy-Delta12-14-PGJ2 (15d-PGJ2). Recently, an oxidized phosphatidylcholine was identified as a potent alternative (patho)physiological natural ligand of PPARgamma. In the present review, we discuss the different PPARgamma-dependent and -independent biological effects of the PG PPARgamma ligands and the concern about their low potency in molecular models as compared with thiazolidinediones (TZDs), a family of potent (nanomolar) synthetic PPARgamma ligands. Finally, the oxidized lipids are presented as a novel and interesting alternative for discovering potent PPARgamma activators in order to understand more in details the implications of PPARgamma in various pathophysiological conditions.

PMID:
11955950
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center