Background: Whether abnormalities of diastolic function are the earliest cardiac change in hypertension is still a matter for dispute. The aim of this study was to assess whether left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is an early sign of cardiac involvement in hypertension.
Methods: In 578 young patients with stage I hypertension from the Hypertension and Ambulatory Recording Venetia Study (HARVEST) and 101 normotensive control patients echocardiographic Doppler examination and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring were performed.
Results: Left ventricular mass, wall thickness, and relative wall thickness, adjusted for confounders, were greater in the hypertensive than in the normotensive patients (all P <.0001). After adjustment for confounders, the A-wave peak velocity was higher in the hypertensive patients (51.5 +/- 11.5 vs 43.4 +/- 8 cm/s, P <.001) as were A-wave velocity time integral (5.6 +/- 1.7 vs 4.6 +/- 1.3 cm, P =.01), total area (16.9 +/- 4.4 vs 15.6 +/- 3.1 cm, P =.04), and E-wave peak velocity (69.9 +/- 15.2 vs 67.5 +/- 13.3 cm/s, P =.03). All indexes of diastolic function were similar in the hypertensive subjects subdivided according to whether they had "white-coat" or sustained hypertension. Among the hypertensive subjects, age and heart rate were the strongest predictors of diastolic indexes, whereas ambulatory blood pressure explained only a marginal part of the E/A ratio, A-wave peak velocity, and the first one third total area ratio (P =.04, P =.02, and P =.05, respectively). Left ventricular mass and wall thickness were not associated with any Doppler index. When a clustering of diastolic indexes (E/A wave ratio, deceleration time, first one third of diastole, and peak E-wave-velocity) was used to identify subjects with diastolic dysfunction, no significant differences in either clinic or ambulatory blood pressure were observed between the group with diastolic dysfunction and the group with normal function.
Conclusions: We conclude that the earliest signs of cardiac involvement in hypertension are left ventricular structural abnormalities. Left ventricular diastolic function is only marginally affected, even when multiple parameters of left ventricular filling are taken into account.