Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Dec 15;33(12):2023-7. Epub 2001 Nov 7.

Laboratory diagnostic techniques for patients with early Lyme disease associated with erythema migrans: a comparison of different techniques.

Author information

1
Division of Infectious Diseases and Department of Medicine, New York Medical College and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA. John_Nowakowski@nymc.edu

Abstract

Recently, a number of refinements in diagnostic modalities for detection of Borrelia burgdorferi infection have been developed. These include large-volume blood cultures, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques, and 2-stage serologic testing. In the present study, we compared 6 diagnostic modalities in 47 adult patients who had a clinical diagnosis of erythema migrans. Quantitative PCR on skin biopsy-derived material was the most sensitive diagnostic method (80.9%), followed by 2-stage serologic testing of convalescent-phase samples (66.0%), conventional nested PCR (63.8%), skin culture (51.1%), blood culture (44.7%), and serologic testing of acute-phase samples (40.4%). Results of all assays were negative for 3 patients (6.4%). We conclude that the clinical diagnosis of erythema migrans is highly accurate in an area where B. burgdorferi is endemic if it is made by experienced health care personnel, but some patients with this diagnosis may not have B. burgdorferi infection. No single diagnostic modality is suitable for detection of B. burgdorferi in every patient with erythema migrans.

PMID:
11700579
DOI:
10.1086/324490
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center