Study of the validity of a questionnaire to assess the adherence to therapy in patients infected by HIV

HIV Clin Trials. 2001 Jan-Feb;2(1):31-7. doi: 10.1310/0Q8A-DFPR-6RV7-HX10.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of our study was to examine the validity of a questionnaire to detect nonadherence in HIV-infected patients under antiretroviral treatment.

Method: This was a cross-sectional study to validate a diagnostic test. Participants consisting of 242 HIV-infected patients were elected by consecutive sampling in a hospital in Madrid. The validation standard was the pharmacy dispensing records with the cut point being 80% and 90% of delivered drugs. Sensitivity (S), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), and positive likelihood ratio (PLR) of the questionnaire were estimated.

Results: The mean age of the participants was 36.2 years old (SE 0.42), 55% were men, and 68.2% had used parenteral drugs. Eighty-three patients (34.3%) did not reach 80% of the prescribed dose and 129 patients (53.3%) did not reach 90%. In the 80% group, S was 25.3% (95% CI, 16.7%-36.2%),SP was 86.2% (95% CI, 79.6%-90.9%), PPV was 48.9% (95% CI, 33.5%-64.3%), and the PLR was 1.83 (95% CI, 1.07-3.13). In the 90% group, the S was 19.4% (95% CI, 13.4%-27.4%), SP was 84.0% (95% CI, 75.7%-90.0%), PPV was 58.1% (95% CI, 42.4%-72.6%), and PLR was 1.22 (95% CI, 0.70-2.12).

Conclusion: The proposed questionnaire is not a reliable diagnostic method to detect nonadherence. It should only be incorporated into the daily clinical practice along with other methods of nonadherence measurement.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active*
  • Female
  • HIV Infections / drug therapy*
  • Humans
  • Likelihood Functions
  • Male
  • Patient Compliance*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Surveys and Questionnaires*