Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Public Health. 2001 Sep;91(9):1512-7.

The quality improvement-research divide and the need for external oversight.

Author information

1
Department of Outcomes Analysis and Decision Support, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10467, USA. ebellin@montefiore.org

Abstract

Historically, quality assurance studies have received scant ethical attention. The advent of information systems capable of supporting research-grade continuous quality improvement projects demands that we clearly define how these projects differ from research and when they require external review. The ethical obligation for the performance of quality assurance projects, with its emphasis on identifiable immediate action for a served population, is a critical distinction. The obligation to perform continuous quality improvement is a deliverable of the social contract entered into implicitly by patients and health care providers and systems. In this article, the authors review the ethical framework that requires these studies, evaluate the differences between quality assurance studies and classic research, and propose criteria for requiring external review.

PMID:
11527790
PMCID:
PMC1446813
DOI:
10.2105/ajph.91.9.1512
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center