Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Autism Dev Disord. 2001 Jun;31(3):315-25.

Comparisons of discrete-trial and normalized behavioral language intervention for young children with autism.

Author information

1
Department of Psychology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti 48197, USA. Psy_Delprato@online.emich.edu

Abstract

This critical review examined a series of 10 controlled studies in which traditional operant behavioral procedures were compared with more recently developed normalized interventions for teaching language to young children with autism. Main characteristics of the older treatments include highly structured direct teaching sessions of discrete trials, teacher initiation, artificial reinforcers, and response shaping. Normalized interventions consist of loosely structured sessions of indirect teaching with everyday situations, child initiation, natural reinforcers, and liberal criteria for presentation of reinforcers. The main conclusion was that in all eight studies with language criterion responses, normalized language training was more effective than discrete-trial training. Furthermore, in both studies that assessed parental affect, normalized treatment yielded more positive affect than discrete-trial training.

PMID:
11518484
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Support Center