Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Cornea. 2001 Aug;20(6):586-9.

Corneoscleral rim cultures: lack of utility and implications for clinical decision-making and infection prevention in the care of patients undergoing corneal transplantation.

Author information

1
Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To assess the utility of donor corneoscleral rim cultures.

METHODS:

A retrospective review of the culture results of 774 corneoscleral rims that remained after trephination of corneas for transplantation into patients at our academic medical center between January 1992 and November 1997.

RESULTS:

Forty-one (5.3%) corneoscleral rim cultures yielded microorganisms, mostly coagulase-negative staphylococci. Two patients developed endophthalmitis (one with Staphylococcus aureus and one with Pseudomonas aeruginosa) within 3 months after transplantation; each had a negative corneoscleral rim culture and neither patient's infection was temporally related to the transplant procedure.

CONCLUSIONS:

Preoperative donor corneoscleral rim cultures are unreliable predictors of endophthalmitis complicating corneal transplantation and, therefore, are not useful in the clinical management of patients having corneal transplants. Moreover, the discrepancy between the results of corneoscleral rim cultures and subsequent endophthalmitis renders them invalid as a quality assurance procedure. Instead, for patients with suspected endophthalmitis after corneal transplantation, we recommend that corneal surgeons select antimicrobial therapy based on current guidelines and the results of directed sampling. Furthermore, eye banks should prospectively track recipients who develop clinical endophthalmitis, immediately notify the corneal surgeon who transplanted the matched cornea of that used for the index case, and, in selected situations, attempt to identify a possible source of contamination.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center