Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
QJM. 2001 Jul;94(7):365-72.

Cost-effectiveness of screening and extended anticoagulation for carriers of both factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A.

Author information

  • 1Laboratory of Medical Informatics, IRCCS Policlinico S.Matteo, and. Department of Computer Science and Systems, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. marchettim@smatteo.pv.it

Abstract

Carriers of a double thrombophilic mutation (factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A) are at high risk of a recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), and may benefit from a longer course of secondary prophylaxis. We examined the costs and health benefits of screening for both the mutations, provided that double heterozygotes undergo 2 years of anticoagulation as compared to the standard 6 months. We thus pooled the available evidence and calculated that the OR for recurrence in double heterozygotes was 5.9 (95% CI 2.65-13.20). A Markov model tracked patients' health lifelong, and calculated that prolonged prophylaxis saved 26 quality-adjusted days of life and $410 per double heterozygote treated. Screening all the patients with venous thromboembolism thus provided one additional day of life at the cost of 13624 $/QALY (95% CI 12 965-22 889). Screening was not cost-effective in those cohorts with a low prevalence of the mutations, a high bleeding risk or in those where prophylaxis prevented <65% of recurrences. Screening for factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A, with prolonged prophylaxis of double carriers, is cost-effective in most patients with VTE.

PMID:
11435632
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Support Center