Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2001 Jul-Aug;16(4):254-8.

Validity of sonographic formulas for estimating fetal weight below 1,250 g: a series of 119 cases.

Author information

1
Maternité Port-Royal, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France. jouannic@nck.ap-hop-paris.fr

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of sonographic methods for estimating fetal weight < 1,250 g on the basis of ten published formulas falling into two principal categories: general formulas applied to all fetuses, and formulas specifically developed for very-low-weight fetuses.

METHODS:

Recent biometric data (obtained less than 7 days before birth) on 119 fetuses weighing < 1,250 g were used retrospectively. Estimated fetal weights derived from ten published formulas were compared to actual weights. For each equation, the errors in predicting fetal weight were used to calculate mean percentage error and standard deviation of the mean error. The t test was used to determine whether the mean errors were significatively different from zero. The F test was used to determine if there were significant differences in the standard deviation of the mean errors.

RESULTS:

The mean birth weight of infants was 956 +/- (SD) 183 g at a gestational age of 29 +/- (SD) 2.3 weeks. The best three formulas were the Hadlock, Sabbagha and Mielke which generated a mean error of -0.25, 2.81 and 0.29 not statistically different from zero with standard deviations of 13.02, 9.14 and 11.96, which were not statistically different.

CONCLUSION:

In our population of very-low-birth-weight infants, the use of specific formulas targeted to those fetuses does not provide a more accurate estimation of fetal weight.

PMID:
11433125
DOI:
53923
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for S. Karger AG, Basel, Switzerland
    Loading ...
    Support Center