Send to

Choose Destination
Can J Anaesth. 2001 Apr;48(4):413-7.

The laryngeal mask airway in infants and children.

Author information

Department of Anesthesiology, National Cancer Center, Koyang, Kyunggi-do, Korea.



To compare the effectiveness of various laryngeal mask airway (LMA) sizes and their performance during positive pressure ventilation (PPV) in paralyzed pediatric patients.


Pediatric patients (n = 158), < 30 kg, ASA 1 or 2 were studied. After paralysis, an LMA of the recommended size was inserted and connected to a volume ventilator. Fibreoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) was performed and graded: 1, larynx only seen; 2, larynx and epiglottis posterior surface seen; 3, larynx, and epiglottis tip or anterior surface seen--visual obstruction of epiglottis to larynx: < 50%; 4, epiglottis down-folded, and its anterior surface seen--visual obstruction of epiglottis to larynx: > 50%; 5, epiglottis down-folded and larynx not seen directly. Inspiratory and expiratory tidal volumes (V(T)), and airway pressure were measured by a pneumo-tachometer, and the fraction of leakage (F(L)) was calculated. In 79 cases, LMA was used for airway maintenance throughout surgery.


Successful LMA placement was achieved in 98% of cases: three failures were due to gastric insufflation. For LMA # 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5, FOB grades [median (range)] were 3(1-5), 3(1-5), 1(1-5) and 1(1-3) respectively. In smaller LMAs, the cuff more frequently enclosed the epiglottis (P < .001). F(L) of LMA # 1 was higher than those of LMA # 1.5 and LMA # 2.5 (P < .05), and F(L) of LMA # 2 was higher than that of LMA # 2.5 (P < .05). In the 79 patients, the number of patients experiencing complications decreased as LMA size increased (P < .05).


Use of the LMA in smaller children results in more airway obstruction, higher ventilatory pressures, larger inspiratory leak, and more complications than in older children.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center