Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Clin Neuropsychol. 2000 Nov;14(4):535-45.

Myths of neuropsychology: intelligence, neurometabolism, and cognitive ability.

Author information

  • 1Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque 87131, USA. rjung@lizard.unm.edu

Abstract

Recently, Dodrill (1999) revised a previously described "Myth of neuropsychology" (1997) to state: "Just as below average performances on neuropsychological tests are found when intelligence is below average, to that same degree above average performances on neuropsychological tests are expected when intellectual abilities are above average." This study addresses the relationship between intellectual and neuropsychological performance in the context of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) measurements of the neurometabolite N-acetylaspartate (NAA). When subjects were stratified by Full Scale IQ (Average, High Average, Superior) they differed significantly in terms of total neuropsychological performance [F(2,47) = 17.63; p <.001] and the neuronal marker NAA [F(2,47) = 3.25; p <.05]. Regression analysis across groups demonstrated that FSIQ and NAA were independently related to Total z-score [F(1,47) = 29.43; p <.0001] and accounted for over half the variance (r(2) of model =.56). The concurrent relationship of FSIQ and NAA to total neuropsychological performance suggests that the relationship between measures sensitive to intellectual ability and neuropsychological performance is real, and does not reflect arbitrary psychometric or scaling properties of the WAIS-III.

PMID:
11262722
DOI:
10.1076/clin.14.4.535.7198
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Support Center