Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2001 Mar;56(3):159-67.

Fetal biometry: clinical, pathological, and technical considerations.

Author information

1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bnai Zion Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. sdegani@tx.technion.ac.il

Abstract

Sonographic measurements of fetal ultrasound parameters are the basis for accurate determination of gestational age and detection of fetal growth abnormalities. Selection of the most useful single biometric parameter depends on the timing and purpose of measurement and is influenced by specific limitations. CRL (crown-rump length) is the best parameter for early dating of pregnancy. Biparietal diameter (BPD) maintains the closest correlation with gestational age in the second trimester. In cases of variation in the shape of the skull, head circumference is an effective alternative. Abdominal circumference is the most useful dimension to evaluate fetal growth, and femur length is the best parameter in the evaluation of skeletal dysplasia. Use of multiple predictors improves the accuracy of estimates. An individual approach to each pregnancy is recommended for fetal growth assessment. The various epidemiological factors involved in fetal growth should be considered and specific charts for different communities should be used when possible. The methods of fetal weight estimation with their limitations and potential errors are presented. Clinical application of fetal biometry in abnormal growth is discussed in cases of small- and large-for-gestational-age fetuses, chromosomal aberrations, and skeletal dysplasias.

PMID:
11254152
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Support Center