Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Mar;158(3):360-9.

Does fast dissociation from the dopamine d(2) receptor explain the action of atypical antipsychotics?: A new hypothesis.

Author information

1
Schizophrenia Program and the PET Centre of the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Canada. skapur@camhpet.on.ca

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Although atypical antipsychotics are becoming the treatment of choice for schizophrenia, what makes an antipsychotic "atypical" is not clear. This article provides a new hypothesis about the mechanism of action of atypical antipsychotics.

METHOD:

Published data regarding the molecular, animal model, neuroimaging, and clinical aspects of typical and atypical antipsychotics were reviewed to develop this hypothesis. Particular attention was paid to data regarding the role of the serotonin 5-HT(2) and dopamine D(4) receptors in atypicality.

RESULTS:

Neuroimaging data show that optimal dopamine D(2) occupancy is sufficient to produce the atypical antipsychotic effect. Freedom from motor side effects results from low D(2) occupancy, not from high 5-HT(2) occupancy. If D(2) occupancy is excessive, atypicality is lost even in the presence of high 5-HT(2) occupancy. Animal data show that a rapid dissociation from the D(2) receptor at a molecular level produces the atypical antipsychotic effect. In vitro data show that the single most powerful predictor of atypicality for the current generation of atypical antipsychotics is fast dissociation from the D(2) receptor, not its high affinity at 5-HT(2), D(4), or another receptor.

CONCLUSIONS:

The authors propose that fast dissociation from the D(2) receptor makes an antipsychotic more accommodating of physiological dopamine transmission, permitting an antipsychotic effect without motor side effects, prolactin elevation, or secondary negative symptoms. In contrast to the multireceptor hypotheses, the authors predict that the atypical antipsychotic effect can be produced by appropriate modulation of the D(2) receptor alone; the blockade of other receptors is neither necessary nor sufficient.

Comment in

PMID:
11229973
DOI:
10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.360
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center