Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001 Mar;84(2):F79-84.

Evidence of selection bias in preterm survival studies: a systematic review.

Author information

1
Centre for Reproduction, Growth and Development, University of Leeds, D Floor Clarendon Wing, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds LS2 9NS, UK. evans_d@southmead.swest.nhs.uk

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To determine by how much selection bias in preterm infant cohort studies results in an overestimate of survival.

DESIGN:

Systematic review of studies reporting survival in infants less than 28 weeks of gestation published 1978-1998. Studies were graded according to cohort definition: A, stillbirths and live births; B, live births; C, neonatal unit admissions. Proportions of infants surviving to discharge were calculated for each week of gestation.

RESULTS:

Sixty seven studies report data on 55 cohorts (16 grade A, 23 grade B, 16 grade C). Studies that are more selective report significantly higher survival between 23 and 26 weeks of gestation (grade C > grade B > grade A, p < 0.01), exaggerating survival by 100% and 56% at 23 and 24 weeks respectively.

CONCLUSION:

To minimise the potential for overestimating survival around the limits of viability, future studies should endeavour to report the outcome of all pregnancies for each week of gestation (terminations, miscarriages, stillbirths, and all live births).

PMID:
11207220
PMCID:
PMC1721223
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center