Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare selected variables measured on a traditional isokinetic dynamometer (Cybex II) with a new lower extremity, closed chain dynamometer (Omnikinetic, OmK).
Methods: Twelve subjects (6 male, 6 female, age = 28+/-5 yr, mean +/- SD) performed Cybex II knee flexion and extension at 1.05, 3.14, and 5.23 rad x s(-1). A maximal effort of 10 repetitions of lower extremity concentric extension and eccentric flexion at 36% of subject's 1-RM was performed on the OmK. Crank power and joint (ankle, knee, and hip) kinetics were recorded as a mean of 10 repetitions.
Results: t-Tests revealed right versus left leg differences (P < 0.05) for Cybex II peak torque flexion at 5.23 rad x s(-1), and OmK knee and hip peak power and hip root mean square power (RMS) power. Cybex peak knee torques were related (Pearson r values 0.78-0.92, P < 0.01) to OmK peak knee torques. Cybex average power was related to OmK knee power (Pearson r values 0.71-0.96, P < 0.01) and OmK crank power (r = 0.62-0.94, P < .01). Correlations tended to be stronger comparing the OmK with the fastest (5.23 rad x s(-1)) Cybex II speed.
Conclusions: These results suggest that the OmK knee and crank kinetic data are comparable to Cybex It isokinetic dynamometry. The ability to evaluate lower extremity joint exercise at a subject's maximal movement speed, in addition to the use of a closed-chain, multi-joint motion, may allow for the OmK to provide a more global evaluation of lower extremity kinetics during seated concentric-extension, eccentric-flexion exercise.