Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Jan;51(1):81-6.

Attitudes and knowledge of hospital pharmacists to adverse drug reaction reporting.

Author information

1
School of Pharmacy and Chemistry, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF. c.f.green@livjm.ac.uk

Abstract

AIMS:

To investigate the attitudes of UK hospital pharmacists towards, and their understanding, of adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting.

METHODS:

A postal questionnaire survey of 600 randomly selected hospital pharmacists was conducted.

RESULTS:

The response rate was 53.7% (n = 322). A total of 217 Yellow Cards had been submitted to the CSM/MCA by 78 (25.6%) of those responding. Half of those responding felt that ADR reporting should be compulsory and over three-quarters felt it was a professional obligation. However, almost half were unclear as to what should be reported, while the time available in clinical practice and time taken to complete forms were deemed to be major deterrents to reporting. Pharmacists were not dissuaded from reporting by the need to consult a medical colleague or by the absence of a fee. Education and training had a significant influence on pharmacists' participation in the Yellow Card Scheme.

CONCLUSIONS:

Pharmacists have a reasonable knowledge and are supportive of the Yellow Card spontaneous ADR reporting scheme. However, education and training will be important in maintaining and increasing ADR reports from pharmacists.

PMID:
11167664
PMCID:
PMC2014418
DOI:
10.1046/j.1365-2125.2001.01306.x
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center