Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Sleep. 2000 Nov 1;23(7):929-38.

The use of clinical prediction formulas in the evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea.

Author information

1
Sleep Disorders Center at Hutzel Hospital, Department of Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. jrowley@intmed.wayne.edu

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES:

To prospectively study the utility of four clinical prediction models for either predicting the presence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA, apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] > or = 10/hour), or prioritizing patients for a split-night protocol (AHI(3)20/hour).

DESIGN:

All patients presenting for OSA evaluation completed a research questionnaire that included questions from previously developed clinical prediction models. The probability of sleep apnea for each patient for each model was calculated based upon the equation used in the model. Based upon two cutoffs of apnea-hypopnea index, 10 and 20, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were calculated. For the cutoffs AHI > or =10 and > or =20, receiver operating characteristic curves were generated and the areas under the curves calculated. Comparisons of demographic information and symptom response were compared between patients with and without OSA, and men vs. women.

SETTING:

Urban, accredited sleep disorders center.

PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS:

All patients referred for evaluation of OSA who underwent polysomnography.

INTERVENTIONS:

N/A.

RESULTS:

370 patients (191 men, 179 women) completed the study. 248 of the 370 (67%) patients had an AHI(3)10; 180 of the 370 (49%) had an AHI> or =20. For AHI > or =10, the sensitivities ranged from 76 to 96%, specificities from 13%-54%, positive predictive values from 69%-77% using the probability cutoff of the original investigators; the areas under the curve from 0.669 to 0.736. For AHI(3)20, the areas under the ROC curves ranged from 0.700 to 0.757; using cutoffs to maximized specificity, the sensitivities ranged from 33%-39%, specificities from 87%-93%, and positive predictive values from 72%-85%. All the models performed better for men.

CONCLUSIONS:

The clinical prediction models tested are not be sufficiently accurate to discriminate between patients with or without OSA but could be useful in prioritizing patients for split-night polysomnography.

PMID:
11083602
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Support Center