Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Immunol Methods. 2000 Nov 1;245(1-2):55-65.

Comparison of four serological methods for the detection of diphtheria anti-toxin antibody.

Author information

1
Department of Immunology and Prevention of Infection, Sera and Vaccines Central Research Laboratory, Warsaw, Poland. walory@urania.il.waw.pl

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare four serological methods for the detection of Corynebacterium diphtheriae IgG anti-toxin antibodies (IgG-DTAb) in human serum. One hundred serum samples were evaluated for C. diphtheriae IgG-DTAb by four different methods: passive haemagglutination (PHA), latex agglutination test (LA), toxoid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Toxoid-ELISA), and toxin-binding inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ToBI-ELISA). As the external standardisation the neutralisation test for C. diphtheriae toxin in Vero cells (TN Vero) was used. For internal standardisation of IgG-DTAb titres, the WHO standard serum of human diphtheria antitoxin was used. The study revealed a poor correlation between the reference test and the PHA (r=0.34 Pearson's correlation coefficient), an acceptable correlation for the LA (r=0.74), a good correlation for the Toxoid-ELISA (r=0.81) and a very good correlation for ToBI-ELISA (r=0.93). The sensitivity measurements of PHA, LA, Toxoid-ELISA and ToBI-ELISA tests, were 14, 100, 94, 96% respectively and the corresponding specificity characteristics were 86, 76, 94, 90 respectively. Of the four evaluated methods, the ToBI-ELISA could be recommended for scientific and precise laboratory assays of diphtheria antibody levels in humans. For screening purposes the Toxoid-ELISA could be used, but the accuracy of antibody titres below 0.1 IU/ml, considered as the limits of protection, is questionable. Both tests offer very useful alternatives to the in vitro diphtheria toxin neutralisation test in Vero cells. Because of their unsatisfactory correlation and sensitivity as compared to the reference method, PHA and LA should be avoided and replaced by one of the two enzyme immunoassays.

PMID:
11042283
DOI:
10.1016/s0022-1759(00)00273-8
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center