Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Clin Anesth. 2000 Aug;12(5):350-6.

Redefining the preoperative evaluation process and the role of the anesthesiologist.

Author information

1
Department of General Anesthesiology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. parkerb1@ccf.org

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE:

To assess the effects of implementing an ambulatory and same-day surgery preoperative evaluation patient triage system over a 3-year period.

DESIGN:

Retrospective analysis of 63,941 ambulatory surgical patients presenting for elective surgery.

SETTING:

Tertiary care, academic medical institution.

INTERVENTIONS:

The following preoperative evaluation model components were implemented over a 3-year period: HealthQuest, which is an outpatient preoperative assessment computer program developed by the Department of General Anesthesiology; a general internal medicine clinic designated specifically for preoperative evaluation and medical optimization; disease specific algorithms for both preoperative patient assessment and management; and a preoperative anesthesia clinic that no longer performs preoperative medical optimization.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:

During the 3-year study period ambulatory and same-day surgical case volume increased 34.7%. A total of 50,967 patients used HealthQuest as part of their preoperative evaluation. Of these patients 22,744 (35.6%) did not need to see an anesthesiologist until the day of surgery as guided by both a computer-assigned HealthQuest score and surgical classification scheme. Also, 41,197 patients were evaluated in our anesthesia preoperative clinic with a cost per evaluation of $24.86, which increased only 0.9% per year. In addition, both patient interview time and patient dissatisfaction with the preoperative process decreased over the 3-year period. There were 20, 088 patient encounters in the general internal medicine clinic for patient medical evaluation and optimization. The average monthly preoperative surgical delay rate decreased 49% during the study period. Finally, significant monetary saving resulted due to decreased unnecessary laboratory testing.

CONCLUSIONS:

Efficient, cost-effective patient care can be provided by using this preoperative evaluation model. Some institutions may find portions of this preoperative model applicable to their current situation.

PMID:
11025233
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center