Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Epidemiol. 2000 Jun;29(3):536-41.

How many data sources are needed to determine diabetes prevalence by capture-recapture?

Author information

1
Division of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Capture-recapture (CR) methods are increasingly used to estimate the size of human populations, including those with diabetes. Few studies have examined the demographic details needed to match patients on the lists used in these techniques, or to determine the optimum number of lists.

METHODS:

Six lists of known diabetic patients attending different medical settings during the study year were obtained. The effects on total enumeration after aggregation of these lists were examined using increasing numbers of demographic data items as patient identifiers. The CR estimates of prevalence were obtained using 15 different combinations of two lists. Estimates were obtained after log-linear modelling for interdependence between different combinations of three and four lists, and after combining the six available lists into three logical lists.

RESULTS:

For matching patients, adding date of birth to first name and family name as matching criteria increased the total of identified patients from 2500 to 2585 (3% increase), corresponding to a period prevalence of 1.5% (95% CI : 1.41-1.52). Addition of further identifiers, such as partial postcode, only increased the estimate by a further 15 patients (0.5%), and more detailed matching with full postcode introduced uncertainty. The use of two-list CR yielded widely varying estimates of the total diabetic population from 1379 (95% CI : 435-2273) to 9554 (95% CI : 7291-10 983). Log-linear modelling using different combinations of three and four lists produced estimates of 5074 (95% CI : 4417-5947) and 5578 (95% CI : 4918-7081), respectively, after compensating for statistical interdependence between the lists used. The appropriate condensation of six available lists into three lists for modelling yielded estimates of 5492 (95% CI : 4870-6285), corresponding to a CR-adjusted period prevalence of 3.1% (95% CI : 3.03-3.19%).

CONCLUSIONS:

In a Western population, the only demographic data required for matching patients on lists used for CR methods are first name, family name and date of birth, if unique identifiers such as social security numbers are not available. Two lists alone do not produce reliable data, and at least three lists are needed to allow for modelling for 'dependence' between datasets. The use of more than three lists does not substantially alter the absolute value or confidence of enumeration, and multiple lists (if available) should be condensed into three lists for use in CR calculations.

PMID:
10869328
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center