Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Apr;53(4):377-83.

Dealing with missing data in observational health care outcome analyses.

Author information

1
The Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease "Approach," 8111 1st Floor ABC, 8440-112 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. cnorris@approach.org

Abstract

Observational outcome analyses appear frequently in the health research literature. For such analyses, clinical registries are preferred to administrative databases. Missing data are a common problem in any clinical registry, and pose a threat to the validity of observational outcomes analyses. Faced with missing data in a new clinical registry, we compared three possible responses: exclude cases with missing data; assume that the missing data indicated absence of risk; or merge the clinical database with an existing administrative database. The predictive model derived using the merged data showed a higher C statistic (C = 0.770), better model goodness-of-fit as measured in a decile-of-risk analysis, the largest gradient of risk across deciles (46.3), and the largest decrease in deviance (-2 log likelihood = 406.2). The superior performance of the enhanced data model supports the use of this "enhancement" methodology and bears consideration when researchers are faced with nonrandom missing data.

PMID:
10785568
DOI:
10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00181-x
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center