Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Invasive Cardiol. 1999 Sep;11(9):543-8.

Feasibility of routine transradial coronary angiography: a single operator's experience.

Author information

1
Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Institut Hospitalier Jacques Cartier, 6 rue du Noyer Lambert, 91300 Massy, France.

Abstract

The aims of this study were to assess the feasibility of routine transradial coronary angiography in a standard population of patients with presumed coronary artery disease over a period of time long enough to allow for technical evolution and evaluation of a single operator's learning curve, and to provide data for a randomized comparison versus the femoral approach. Between June 1994 and March 1997, transradial angiography was attempted in 1,000 patients. Approximately 25% of these patients were excluded because of an abnormal Allen test. Except in the case of acute myocardial infarction, there was no selection based on symptoms, age, sex, weight or size in the absence of double internal mammary artery bypass graft operation or simultaneous right heart catheterization. Symptoms and angiographic results were typical of a standard population. The right radial approach was used in 95% of the cases for ease of handling and comfort of a right-handed operator. Radial artery puncture and catheterization success was obtained in 97.6% of the cases; the left coronary artery was selectively catheterized in 100%, right coronary artery in 98%, left ventricle in 96.9%, mammary artery grafts in 100% and saphenous grafts in 97.2%. Average procedure duration was 18 +/- 9 minutes, and decreased progressively with experience and catheter strategies. The optimal catheter selection would seem to be a single catheter, either left Amplatz or Champ, for both coronary arteries. Two coronary complications and 3 transient neurological complications occurred, but no clinically significant vascular complications requiring surgery or transfusion were reported. Transradial angiography seems to be a routine approach that should now be compared with the femoral approach and supersede the brachial approach whenever possible.

Comment in

PMID:
10745593
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center