Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Gastroenterology. 2000 Apr;118(4):678-87.

Development and validation of a self-report symptom inventory to assess the severity of oral-pharyngeal dysphagia.

Author information

1
Department of Gastroenterology, St. George Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS:

The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the validity and reliability of a self-report inventory to measure symptomatic severity of oral-pharyngeal dysphagia.

METHODS:

Test-retest reliability and face, content, and construct validity of a prototype visual analogue scale inventory were assessed in 45 patients who had stable, neuromyogenic dysphagia.

RESULTS:

Normalized scores varied over time by -0.5% +/- 17.6% (95% confidence interval, -9.2% to 8.2%). Factor analysis identified a single factor (dysphagia), to which 18 of 19 questions contributed significantly, that accounted for 56% of total variance (P < 0.0001). After deletion of 2 questions with poor face validity and patient compliance, this proportion increased to 59%; mean test-retest change was -2% (95% confidence interval, -11% to 7%); and total score correlated highly with an independent global assessment severity score (r = 0.7; P < 0.0001). A mean 70% reduction in score (P < 0.0001) was observed after surgery in patients with Zenker's diverticulum (discriminant validity).

CONCLUSIONS:

Applied to patients with neuromyogenic dysphagia, the 17-question inventory shows strong test-retest reliability over 2 weeks as well as face, content, and construct validity. Discriminant validity (responsiveness) has been demonstrated in a population with a correctable, structural cricopharyngeal disorder. Responsiveness of the instrument to treatment in neuromyogenic dysphagia remains to be quantified.

PMID:
10734019
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center