Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Nov 1;45(4):923-9.

Pretreatment factors predict overall survival for patients with low-grade glioma: a recursive partitioning analysis.

Author information

1
Department of Oncology, University of Western Ontario, and London Regional Cancer Centre, Canada. glenn_bauman@lrcc.on.ca

Abstract

PURPOSE:

Three databases were pooled and analyzed to determine which groupings of prognostic factors best predicted overall survival for patients with low-grade gliomas treated with surgery and immediate or delayed radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS:

Databases of patients with low-grade gliomas compiled at the London Regional Cancer Centre (LRCC), the Norwegian Radium Hospital (NRH), and the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) were merged. Inclusion criteria for the pooled analysis included: age > or =18 years and histologically confirmed low-grade (World Health Organization Grade II) supratentorial fibrillary astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma or mixed oligoastrocytoma. Factors analyzed for prognostic significance included: age at diagnosis, gender, seizures at presentation, presence of enhancement on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) at diagnosis, histology, extent of surgical resection, timing of radiotherapy, and treating institution. Univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival for these factors was performed. Recursive partitioning was performed to generate prognostic groups using these factors.

RESULTS:

From the combined databases, 401 patients were eligible for analysis. Median survival for the entire group was 95 months/7.9 years. On univariate analysis age 18-40, presence of seizures at presentation, KPS > or =70, treating institution, and absence of contrast enhancement were associated with improved overall survival. On multivariate analysis, these factors remained independent predictors of improved overall survival. Recursive partitioning analysis yielded four prognostic groups with statistically different median survivals (MS): Group I (n = 41: KPS <70, age >40) MS 12 months; Group II (n = 34: KPS > or =70, age >40, enhancement present) MS 46 months; Group III (n = 138: KPS <70, age 18-40 or KPS > or =70 age >40, no enhancement) MS 87 months; Group IV (n = 188: KPS > or =70, age 18-40) MS 128 months.

CONCLUSION:

Clusters of pretreatment prognostic factors described subgroups of low-grade glioma patients with divergent overall survivals. Consideration of these prognostic subgroups may be important when considering timing of interventions for these patients and in the stratification of patients for clinical trials.

PMID:
10571199
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center