Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Public Health. 1999 Nov;89(11):1649-57.

Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: a challenge to practice and policy.

Author information

1
Program in Biology, Ethics, and the Politics of Human Production, Wellesley College, MA 02481-8201, USA. aasch@wellesley.edu

Abstract

Professionals should reexamine negative assumptions about the quality of life with prenatally detectable impairments and should reform clinical practice and public policy to improve informed decision making and genuine reproductive choice. Current data on children and families affected by disabilities indicate that disability does not preclude a satisfying life. Many problems attributed to the existence of a disability actually stem from inadequate social arrangements that public health professionals should work to change. This article assumes a pro-choice perspective but suggests that unreflective uses of prenatal testing could diminish, rather than expand, women's choices. This critique challenges the view of disability that lies behind the social endorsement of such testing and the conviction that women will or should end their pregnancies if they discover that the fetus has a disabling trait.

Comment in

PMID:
10553384
PMCID:
PMC1508970
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center