Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Clin Sci (Lond). 1999 Oct;97(4):515-22.

Reproducibility of methods for assessing baroreflex sensitivity in normal controls and in patients with chronic heart failure.

Author information

1
National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, U.K. c.davies@rbh.nthames.nhs.uk

Abstract

Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) conveys useful prognostic information in patients with heart disease, yet methods for its quantification suffer from poor reproducibility and test failure in some patients with heart failure. We set out to compare the short-term reproducibility and success rate of four different methods of assessing BRS in normal subjects and patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). A total of 31 patients with CHF and 18 normal controls underwent BRS testing using four techniques: (1) bolus phenylephrine (BRS(Phe)), (2) alpha-index in both low- and high-frequency bands (BRS(alphaLF) and BRS(alphaHF) respectively), (3) the sequence method (BRS(Seq)), and (4) a new 0.1 Hz controlled-breathing, time-domain analysis method (BRS(Cbr)). Each subject underwent two test episodes with each method on the same day. The average values for BRS in patients and controls respectively were: BRS(Phe), 4.4 (+/-4.4) ms/mmHg and 19.8 (+/-11.5) ms/mmHg; BRS(alphaLF), 5.6 (+/-4.1) ms/mmHg and 15.4 (+/-5.0) ms/mmHg; BRS(alphaHF), 7.1 (+/-7.0) ms/mmHg and 25.1 (+/-8.3) ms/mmHg; BRS(Seq), 7.7 (+/-6.3) ms/mmHg and 22.5 (+/-8.4) ms/mmHg; BRS(Cbr), 6.6 (+/-5.9) ms/mmHg and 22.8 (+/-10.8) ms/mmHg. The coefficients of variation (S.D. of the difference in repeated values divided by mean) in patients and controls respectively were: BRS(Phe), 85.6% and 52.2%; BRS(alphaLF), 65.9% and 33.7%; BRS(alphaHF), 99.7% and 52. 1%; BRS(Seq), 30.7% and 40.4%; BRS(Cbr), 30.7% and 19.6%. The numbers of test failures in patients were: BRS(Phen), 15; BRS(alphaLF), 7; BRS(alphaHF), 5; BRS(Seq), 14; BRS(Cbr), 1. Of the four techniques assessed for measuring BRS, the controlled breathing time-domain method yielded the best reproducibility and lowest failure rate in controls and in patients with CHF.

PMID:
10491352
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Support Center