Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Ophthalmology. 1999 Aug;106(8):1579-87.

Comparison of episcleral plaque and proton beam radiation therapy for the treatment of choroidal melanoma.

Author information

1
St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, England.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To compare the efficacy of iodine-125 (125I) and ruthenium-106 (106Ru) episcleral plaque radiation therapy and proton beam radiation therapy (PBRT) in the treatment of choroidal melanoma.

DESIGN:

A retrospective, nonrandomized comparative study.

METHODS:

Charts of patients treated with 125I, 106Ru, and PBRT for choroidal melanoma between January 1988 and June 1996 at St. Bartholomew's Hospital and Moorfields Eye Hospitals were reviewed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:

Local control of choroidal melanomas after 125I, 106Ru, or PBRT.

RESULTS:

A total of 597 patients were identified (125I = 190, 106Ru = 140, PBRT = 267). Patients treated with 106Ru had a significantly greater risk of local tumor recurrence than did patients treated with either 125I (P = 0.0133; confidence interval [CI], 1.26-7.02; risk ratio, 2.97) or PBRT (P = 0.0097; CI, 1.30-6.66; risk ratio, 2.94). A stepwise Cox proportional hazard model found maximal basal diameter to be a significant covariate (P = 0.0033).

CONCLUSION:

Patients treated with 106Ru had a significantly greater risk of local tumor recurrence than did those patients treated with either 125I or PBRT.

PMID:
10442907
DOI:
10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90456-6
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center