Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Periodontol. 1999 Jan;70(1):49-56.

Prognosis versus actual outcome. IV. The effectiveness of clinical parameters and IL-1 genotype in accurately predicting prognoses and tooth survival.

Author information

1
Department of Periodontics, University of Texas, Dental Branch Houston, USA. mkmperio@hal-pc.org

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Recently, a genetic marker (IL-1 genotype) that identifies individuals at higher risk for developing severe periodontal disease was discovered. A subgroup of the population reported on earlier was evaluated to determine if knowledge of the patient's IL-1 genotype would improve accuracy in assignment of prognoses and prediction of tooth loss.

METHODS:

This subgroup consisted of 42 patients (1,044 teeth) in maintenance care for 14 years; 16 tested IL-1 genotype-positive (IL-1GP). Nine were smokers, and 30 had a history of smoking, with an average of 29.44 pack years. A multiple Cox regression model and Kaplan-Meier survival plots were fit to the subset of patients to evaluate tooth loss.

RESULTS:

Both IL-1GP and heavy smoking were significantly related to tooth loss. A positive IL-1 genotype increased the risk of tooth loss by 2.7 times, and heavy smoking by 2.9 times. The combined effect of IL-1GP and heavy smoking increased the risk of tooth loss by 7.7 times. The value of clinical parameters traditionally used to assign prognosis was found to be dependent on IL-genotype and smoking status. In the model that included IL-1 genotype and heavy smoking, none of the clinical parameters added significantly to the model for tooth loss while mobility, probing depth, crown-to-root ratio, and percent bone loss added significantly to the model, which included IL-1 genotype in non-smokers. IL-1GP patients and patients who smoked heavily demonstrated a much worse tooth survival rate when compared to IL-1 genotype-negative patients and non-smokers, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Knowledge of the patient's IL-1 genotype and smoking status will improve the clinician's ability to accurately assign prognosis and predict tooth survival. Clinical implications are as follows. Investigators were unable to judge which patients would be IL-GP or negative based on their clinical presentation or family history of tooth loss due to periodontal disease. Since periodontal diseases are multifactorial, knowledge of the patient's genotype is more important in predicting future risk than explaining past disease. Knowledge of IL-1 genotype status would be important in developing a treatment plan and predicting tooth survival for a new patient who smokes and presents with periodontal disease, especially if restorative care is needed. Knowledge of a maintenance patient's IL-1 status would help target therapy for non-responding areas; one would be less likely to take a "wait and see approach" with IL-1GP patients. IL-1 positive non-smokers can be successfully treated and maintained over long periods of time.

PMID:
10052770
DOI:
10.1902/jop.1999.70.1.49
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center