Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Virol Methods. 1999 Jan;77(1):17-26.

Comparison of seven RNA extraction methods on stool and shellfish samples prior to hepatitis A virus amplification.

Author information

  • 1Laboratoire de Virologie, Institut de Biologie, CHRU de Nantes, France. sbi@sante.univ-nantes.fr

Abstract

When choosing an extraction method, two parameters have to be considered: recovery of the viral material and elimination or inactivation of inhibitory substances. Seven techniques for extracting hepatitis A virus (HAV) from stool and shellfish samples were compared, in order to identify the protocol most suited to both types of sample and with the best extraction yield. The protocols tested were either techniques for the recovery and purification of total RNA, such as RNAzol, PEG-CETAB, GTC-silica and Chelex, or techniques for isolating specifically HAV using a nucleotide probe or a monoclonal antibody. For stool samples, RNAzol, PEG-CETAB, and magnetic beads with antibody allowed detection of the virus in 11/12 and 12/12 of samples. For shellfish samples, three protocols allowed RNA to be extracted in 90% of cases, RNAzol, PEG-CETAB, and GTC-silica. Their rapidity and low cost make RNAzol and GTC-silica the most suitable for routine diagnostic testing. reserved.

PMID:
10029321
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center