U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 5

2.
Fig 1

Fig 1. Survival according to primary tumour sidedness after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.. From: Primary tumour location affects survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases: A two-institutional cohort study with international validation, systematic meta-analysis and a clinical risk score.

(A) Overall survival (n = 259; p = 0.051) and (B) disease-free survival (n = 258; missing = 1; p = 0.078) in own cohort of patients undergoing curative-intent liver resection for colorectal liver metastases.

Elisabeth Gasser, et al. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0217411.
3.
Fig 2

Fig 2. Survival according to a clinical risk score including sidedness, nodal positivity and extrahepatic disease.. From: Primary tumour location affects survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases: A two-institutional cohort study with international validation, systematic meta-analysis and a clinical risk score.

(A) Overall survival (n = 258; missing = 1; p = 0.005) and (B) disease-free survival (n = 257; missing = 2; p = 0.027) in own cohort of patients undergoing curative-intent liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Each factor (right-sided primary-tumour, positive lymph-nodes and extrahepatic disease) was accounted for one point in this score). (C) Overall survival (n = 517; missing = 10; p = 0.001) and (D) disease-free survival (n = 517; missing = 10; p = 0.011) in the international validation cohort.

Elisabeth Gasser, et al. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0217411.
4.
Fig 5

Fig 5. Association of right-sided primary tumour location with disease-free survival (meta-analysis).. From: Primary tumour location affects survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases: A two-institutional cohort study with international validation, systematic meta-analysis and a clinical risk score.

Meta-analysis of published studies including own data (Heterogeneity: I2 = 72.4% / p<0.001). (A) Forrest plot: right-sided primary tumour location is associated with worse disease-free survival after resection for liver metastases, however not significant in the random effects model (p = 0.077). (B) Funnel plot analysis does indicate only a minimal publication bias with two large study outliers outside the 95%CI (at the tip of the pyramid) but no small trial bias (two smaller studies on the left side of the overall effects line have larger counterparts on the right side). CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; KRASmut/wt = KRAS mutated or wild-type subgroup; with / w/o CTX = with or without preoperative chemotherapy.

Elisabeth Gasser, et al. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0217411.
5.
Fig 4

Fig 4. Association of right-sided primary tumour location with overall survival (meta-analysis).. From: Primary tumour location affects survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases: A two-institutional cohort study with international validation, systematic meta-analysis and a clinical risk score.

Meta-analysis of published studies including own data (Heterogeneity: I2 = 50.8% / p = 0.0216). (A) Forrest plot: right-sided primary tumour location is significantly associated with worse overall survival after resection for liver metastases (random effects model: p<0.001) (B) Funnel plot analysis does not indicate a relevant publication bias but minor small trial bias: While the number of larger studies (tip of the pyramid) on both sides of the total effects line are evenly distributed, two smaller studies with an overestimating positive effect have only one negative study as counterparts (base of the pyramid). CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; KRASmut/wt = KRAS mutated or wild-type subgroup; with or w/o CTX = with or without preoperative chemotherapy.

Elisabeth Gasser, et al. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0217411.

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center