U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 4

1.
Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.Representative photo panel. From: Perception of upper lip augmentation utilizing simulated photography.

Representative panel of three conditions for one patient, including natural (original, unaltered photograph) (A), simulated filler (B), and simulated upper lip lift (C).

Gary Linkov, et al. Arch Plast Surg. 2019 May;46(3):248-254.
2.
Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.Perception scores across conditions. From: Perception of upper lip augmentation utilizing simulated photography.

Perception scores across conditions for each patient. (A) Attractiveness, (B) successfulness, (C) overall health. 1, crude (natural); 2, simulated filler; 3, simulated upper lip lift.

Gary Linkov, et al. Arch Plast Surg. 2019 May;46(3):248-254.
3.
Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.Grouped scores by survey respondents. From: Perception of upper lip augmentation utilizing simulated photography.

Box plots of scores assigned by survey respondents evaluating photos of women for perceived attractiveness, health, and level of success. (A) Scores visually grouped by type of personal attribute. (B) Scores visually grouped by type of simulated treatment. CP, crude photo (natural); SLL, simulated upper lip lift; SLF, simulated upper lip filler; A, attractive; H, healthy; S, successful.

Gary Linkov, et al. Arch Plast Surg. 2019 May;46(3):248-254.
4.
Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.Marginal mean score of various treatments. From: Perception of upper lip augmentation utilizing simulated photography.

Marginal differences between scores assigned to different treatments. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) around mean marginal differences for scores of attractiveness, health, and success assigned to each of the three photo types including the crude photo (CP), simulated upper lip lift (SLL), and simulated upper lip filler (SLF). The horizontal axes have been reduced in scale to improve visualization of the statistically significant marginal differences. Positive values indicate that the treatment listed first (left vertical axis) received a higher score in each of the nine clusters. Statistical significance indicated by all parameters that do not include zero marginal mean score.

Gary Linkov, et al. Arch Plast Surg. 2019 May;46(3):248-254.

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center