U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 3

1.
Figure 1.

Figure 1. Cohort Creation for Study of Renin-Angiotensin Inhibitor Treatment After TAVR. From: Association of Renin-Angiotensin Inhibitor Treatment With Mortality and Heart Failure Readmission in Patients With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Additional exclusion criteria were applied to create a quality-of-care analysis cohort (eFigure 4 in the ). TAVR indicates transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Taku Inohara, et al. JAMA. 2018 Dec 4;320(21):2231-2241.
2.
Figure 3.

Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier Curves for Mortality by Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Status. From: Association of Renin-Angiotensin Inhibitor Treatment With Mortality and Heart Failure Readmission in Patients With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

The median observation time in panel A was 4.8 months (95% CI, 4.4-5.3 months) for no prescription and 5.1 months (95% CI, 4.6-5.9 months) for prescription of an renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor; and panel B, 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.6-5.0 months) vs 4.5 months (95% CI, 3.6-5.3 months), respectively. There was a significant interaction between the prescription of a RAS inhibitor and left ventricular ejection fraction (P = .04 for interaction). ARD indicates absolute risk difference; HR, hazard ratio.

Taku Inohara, et al. JAMA. 2018 Dec 4;320(21):2231-2241.
3.
Figure 2.

Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier Curves and Landmark Analysis for Mortality and Cumulative Incidence Curves for Heart Failure Readmission. From: Association of Renin-Angiotensin Inhibitor Treatment With Mortality and Heart Failure Readmission in Patients With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

The median observation time in panel A was 4.7 months (95% CI, 4.2-5.1 months) for no prescription and 5.0 months (95% CI, 4.5-5.5 months) for prescription of an renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor; panel B, 2.4 months (95% CI, 2.0-6.8 months) vs 2.6 months (95% CI, 2.1-8.0 months), respectively; panel C, 5.3 months (95% CI, 4.9-5.7 months) vs 5.6 months (95% CI, 5.2-6.1 months); and panel D, 4.8 months (95% CI, 4.2-5.7 months) vs 4.6 months (95% CI, 4.0-6.7 months). The landmark analyses were conducted post hoc. Only patients without events at 1 month were considered in the analysis after the landmark time point (panels C and D). ARD indicates absolute risk difference; HR, hazard ratio.

Taku Inohara, et al. JAMA. 2018 Dec 4;320(21):2231-2241.

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center